Call us:
(888) 571-1001
Maritime Jones Act Lawyer | Offshore Injury Attorney
Offshore Injury Lawyer | Maritime Lawyer | NO WIN NO FEE

Hamilton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock — A Slippery Painted Step & a $1.22M Jones Act Verdict

  • Home
  • Hamilton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock — A Slippery Painted Step & a $1.22M Jones Act Verdict
Hamilton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock — A Slippery Painted Step & a $1.22M Jones Act Verdict | Doyle Dennis Avery LLP
Reviewed for legal accuracy by Michael P. Doyle & Patrick M. Dennis · Last updated May 2026
Case Study · Jones Act Negligence · Dredge / Inland Waters

One painted step with no non-skid — and a verdict with no fault on the worker.

A dredge leverman slipped on a freshly-painted bottom step in the rain and fell to the deck. The case came down to a basic question of marine custom and practice: what makes a stairway safe — and who is responsible when it isn’t.

$1.22M
Jury verdict
0% at fault
No comparative negligence found
Memphis, Tennessee
Cutter suction dredge
Jones Act negligence
An unsafe, slippery step

Case summary

Hamilton, a leverman on the cutter suction dredge Pontchartrain, slipped on a freshly painted bottom step that lacked the non-skid surface the other steps had. A Harris County jury found Great Lakes Dredge & Dock negligent under the Jones Act, assigned Hamilton no share of the fault, and awarded $1,222,491.33.

01 The worker & the dredge

A leverman on a cutter suction dredge.

Roger Hamilton worked as a leverman aboard the Pontchartrain, a cutter suction dredge operated by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company. The dredge was working in Lake McKellar on the Mississippi River near Memphis, Tennessee, finishing a maintenance-dredging contract for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

A dredge is a vessel in the eyes of maritime law — the U.S. Supreme Court said as much in Stewart v. Dutra — so its crew are Jones Act seamen, with the right to hold the employer to a duty of reasonable care for their safety.

02 The step

Thirteen steps of grating — and one that wasn’t.

On a drizzling November morning, after the day’s 7 a.m. work meeting, Hamilton started down the port bow stairway from the quarters deck to the main deck — a steep run of fourteen steps, roughly ten feet of drop. He slipped on the bottom step and fell to the deck. A deckhand saw it happen.

What set the bottom step apart was its surface. The top thirteen steps were open expanded-metal grating, which sheds water and grips a boot. The bottom step alone was raised diamond-plate steel — and it had just been freshly painted, part of a top-to-bottom repaint of the dredge that included the outside stairways. Wet enamel paint dries to a slick surface, and in the rain that one step had nothing to grip.

03 The standard the company skipped

What custom and practice required.

A raised diamond pattern stops being a non-skid surface once decades of paint fill it in.

The case was built on marine custom and practice, established through a marine-safety expert. A diamond-plate step is supposed to resist slips through its raised pattern — but the Pontchartrain was built in 1962, and after decades of repainting, paint had filled the spaces between the raised diamonds and flattened their grip. The accepted answer in the industry is straightforward: lay an abrasive non-skid strip across the front edge of the tread, or mix a non-skid grit such as sand into the paint, so the step holds even in drizzle. None of that had been done to the step that gave way.

The standard of care, in other words, was not exotic. A reasonably prudent operator keeps its stairways safe in the weather its crews actually work in, and an employer’s duty to provide a safe place to work is non-delegable. The record also raised a separate concern about safety culture: it appeared the company had not filed the marine-casualty report that federal regulations require when a crew member is hurt badly enough to need real medical care and is left unable to do the job.

04 Negligence — without unseaworthiness

You don’t need both theories to win.

The case was submitted to the jury on two independent theories: Jones Act negligence against the employer and unseaworthiness of the vessel. The jury found Great Lakes negligent under the Jones Act and found that its negligence caused the incident — while declining to find the dredge itself unseaworthy. That split is worth understanding: the two theories are separate, and a worker can win on employer negligence alone.

Just as important, the jury found Hamilton zero percent at fault. The hazard was the company’s — a step it had painted slick and left without a non-skid surface — not the worker’s for using the stairway he was expected to use.

05 The result

$1.22 million, no fault on the worker.

The Harris County jury awarded Roger Hamilton $1,222,491.33 in damages — including past and future medical care, past and future loss of earning capacity (with more than $400,000 for future earning capacity alone), and amounts for pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. After a stipulated credit for an advance the company had paid, the court entered judgment on the verdict.

The case was tried by Michael P. Doyle and Patrick M. Dennis, now of Doyle Dennis Avery LLP.

Legal lessons from this case

  • A dredge is a vessel, so its crew are generally Jones Act seamen.
  • Jones Act negligence and unseaworthiness are independent theories; here the jury found negligence but not unseaworthiness.
  • Evidence of custom and practice, such as non-skid on every other step, can establish a negligent condition.
  • Comparative fault can be assigned at zero; being blamed does not mean a worker bears any of the fault.

Frequently asked questions

Is a dredge a vessel under maritime law?

Generally yes. Courts treat a working dredge as a vessel, which usually makes its crew Jones Act seamen.

Can a slip and fall be a Jones Act case?

Yes. A slip and fall caused by an unsafe condition, such as a step without non-skid, can be Jones Act negligence when the worker is a seaman.

Do I have to be found partly at fault?

No. Comparative fault is decided on the evidence and can be zero; in this case the jury assigned the worker no fault at all.

What was the result in Hamilton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock?

A Harris County jury found the employer negligent under the Jones Act, assigned the worker no fault, and awarded $1,222,491.33.

Free · Confidential · No Fee Unless We Win

Fell on an unsafe deck or stairway offshore or on a vessel?

A slick, poorly maintained step can make an employer liable under the Jones Act — even without proving the vessel was unseaworthy. Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has tried these cases to verdict. A case review costs nothing, and there is no obligation.

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP · 3401 Allen Parkway, Suite 100, Houston, TX 77019

This page is attorney advertising and is for general information only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The case described was decided on its own facts; prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Doyle Dennis Avery LLP · Houston, Texas.

Doyle Dennis Avery LLPMaritime & Offshore Injury · Houston, Texas